Tag Archives: history

WALKING TOGETHER

I was chatting with a couple of guys in Murupara a while ago, waiting for an event to start. One of them was telling us that he farmed a piece of land that his father had been balloted after World War II. That is when land was given to returned soldiers, to rehabilitate them back into civilian life. The Government wanted to channel any discontent into hard work. And work hard they did.

I looked at our other companion. He was from Ngāti Manawa. I knew that his father had been maimed in that war and had returned home to Murupara to find his tribal lands taken and given to Pākehā soldiers. Māori were not eligible under the land scheme. I wondered what he was thinking. He showed no outward animosity and our farmer friend showed no awareness of what it might mean to him. He had no reason to feel guilty. He hadn’t stolen the land. His father hadn’t either and probably had no idea that it was even stolen. They had been given an opportunity and had used it to build a productive farm over generations by the sweat of their brows.

It was such a telling illustration of our country. One set of people dispossessed by a government that saw them as incapable and undeserving. Another set of people who had worked hard to make a good life but had no idea of the injustice that they had benefitted from. In that gulf between those worlds I see a huge amount of graciousness from tangata whenua, like the pōwhiri that we were attending, which welcomed everyone into the ancestral house and treated us all with respect and care.

Māori / Pākehā relationships in this country cannot be simplified into good guys / bad guys. Real life is more complex, interesting and rich. But it can be useful to step back and look at the broad picture. Waitangi Day gives us an opportunity to remember where we have come from and reaffirm where we want to go as a nation.

It is important to understand that Māori never did cede sovereignty in Te Tiriti. The Māori language version of the Treaty of Waitangi – the one signed by most Rangatira and the one that takes precedence under the international legal doctrine of contra proferentum – clearly affirms the sovereignty (tino rangatiratanga) of hapū. Hobson’s Choice and other groups can try to rewrite history but Governor Hobson’s own words at Waitangi in 1840, recorded by eyewitness William Colenso, state clearly that the British were not seeking to make laws to govern Māori. They were seeking only to govern their own unruly people that had come to this land.

It was only when large numbers of settlers arrived and a new Governor was appointed that an attempt was made to assert British authority over Māori communities. There are plenty of good history books, and Waitangi Tribunal reports, that document the way that successive Governments used legislation, debt and war to take Māori lands and resources, and destroy their political and economic structures to force them to come under the authority of the Crown.

Our own history in the Whakatāne District is full of terrible things that were done to local iwi and hapū. That includes the deliberate desecration of some of their most sacred places by previous incarnations of the Council. While there have been real efforts over the past few decades to acknowledge these wrongs and to stop adding to the list, we continue to deal with a legacy of local authority decisions that ignored Māori interests, concerns and authority. As mayor I am still grappling with some of these issues today. I am aware that although the population in our district is around 50% Māori, their voices have historically carried little weight in council decisions. We have made it a collective priority in the last few terms of council to address that.

Our Māori Relationships Strategy – Te Toi Waka Whakarei – outlines what we need to do as a council to build better relationships with iwi, hapū, and whānau. It starts with building our own capacity to engage and listen, and it means taking on board what we hear. It’s a journey but we are already seeing some progress. Instead of fighting – in court, in the media and around the table – we are starting to work together. At the end of the day, we all want the best outcomes for our communities.

We have an opportunity to do something really significant as a district. We can show how to live together with integrity as Tangata Whenua and Tangata Tiriti. We can create political and social processes and institutions that marry the best of Te Ao Māori and Te Ao Pākeha. We can demonstrate what it means to be bi-modal and multi-cultural by simple virtue of our demographics and the strength of our connections with each other. We can show the world an alternative to the hatred and fear being fostered to keep us all distracted and divided.

(Mayoral column in the Whakatāne Beacon 26 Feb 2026)

Tagged , , , , , , , ,

LOCALS, NOT WELLINGTON, SHOULD DECIDE THE SHAPE OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT

People keep asking how I’m finding it being mayor. As you can imagine, it’s been hectic.

I had a fair idea of what I was in for, but it’s definitely been a case of hitting the ground running. We’ve had a weighty induction schedule for the new Council, plus a variety of mayoral activities and Christmas events. We are almost at the end of the year, which is always a busy time as things wind up. (Thanks go out to staff who keep essential Council services running while most of us are at the beach).

On top of that, the government has recently dropped an avalanche of reform on local government which is taking a lot of my focus. Most people agree that some change is overdue and what the government is proposing is not all bad, but the timeframes are tight, the details are often fuzzy and there are some real barbs in there. With some ridiculously short timeframes, I encourage everyone to speak up. We shouldn’t allow Wellington to dictate how local decisions get made, without having a say.

The “Simplifying Local Government” announcement has been touted as delivering the most significant changes to local government since 1989.  Under this proposal the Regional Council would stay in place for now but the regional councillors would be replaced by the mayors from across the region sitting as a Combined Territories Board (in our spare time I guess). These CTBs might or might not include independent commissioners, who might or might not have veto powers. The CTB would also have a two year deadline to design the future shape of local government in the region, which could include amalgamations, unitary authorities or other options. The timeframe is unclear, with mixed signals about this coming from Wellington, but submissions close on 20 February.

So there is lots of uncertainty – the batter is still raw in the middle of that particular biscuit. Still, it’s an opportunity for us all to have a think about what local government could look like, because whether under this government or the next, we can expect change.

There is a case for simplifying things.  Most people don’t understand what the different parts of local government do and it can lead to a lack of alignment across councils. We do need to make sure that whatever we end up with has democratic representation, protects the environment and community values, and ensures tangata whenua participation.

Rates capping is another government announcement. Under this proposal annual rates increases would be limited from 2029 to a “target range” between 2% to 4% per year. Councils wishing to exceed the cap would need approval from a central-government appointed regulator – and only in exceptional circumstances such as disaster response.  

It’s easy to see why this sounds attractive. People are hurting and double-digit annual rates increases are unsustainable, but it could backfire. In Australia rates capping has led to underinvestment in core infrastructure with ‘variations’ every few years to compensate, leading to massive rates spikes. It means that communities get very little say about what their councils do and at the end of the day councillors need to be accountable to our voters, not to Wellington.

The Resource Management Act (RMA) is being replaced by two bills – the Planning Bill and the Natural Environment Bill. This is not very different in principle from the reforms that the last Labour-led government introduced although some of the details differ. They centralise a lot of the planning functions, and remove a number of protections for things that our communities value. They also make councils potentially liable for compensation if rules protect things like sites of significance for Māori, ‘outstanding natural feature / landscapes’ and places with high natural character.

Again, you can see the attraction. Everyone wants to do what they like on their own land. The problem is that people often don’t like their neighbours to have the same right.

A lot of the purpose of the reform is to support development and make it easier and cheaper for private landowners to do things. That could be a good thing but it needs to be balanced. Savings to individuals at the cost of pushing those costs and compliance onto councils – which drives up rates. At the same time the government intends to cap those rates. The maths doesn’t add up.

The next column will be in 2026 – time flies. On behalf of Councillors I’d like to wish residents, and visitors, a happy and safe holiday period. Kia haumaru, kia hari ngā hararei.

(Mayoral column for the Whakatāne Beacon 19 Dec 2025)

Tagged , , , , ,