MORE THAN MATERNITY SERVICES AT STAKE


The massive downgrading of maternity services at Whakatāne Hospital is just the tip of the
iceburg. Investigations have revealed a hospital in crisis, with dedicated and highly
competent staff struggling to keep servicing the community within a dysfunctional system.
When news first broke that Obstetrics and Gynecology services were closing, the public
was told that it was just a recruitment issue and that secondary maternity services
(obstetrics) would resume in 12 months. After speaking to a number of staff within the
hospital, it is clear that there are far bigger issues that have led to this closure, and which
threaten other departments. The community has a right to know, and to make our voices
heard.
Recruitment is absolutely an issue, with a shortage of obstetricians globally, but more
importantly the recruitment process at Whakatāne Hospital is a shambles. A number of
departments have chronic staff shortages, but they get almost no recruitment support.
When they manage to find applicants, getting contracts signed off by the bureaucracy in
Tauranga can take up to ten months. The coalition organising Saturday’s Hikoi for Health
has heard of multiple examples of great people being recruited by local senior staff, but by
the time their contracts are approved they have moved on.
Other applicants have become so frustrated by the lengthy delays in getting a permanent
contract that they end up applying through a recruitment agency and being taken on as a
locum, at a higher cost and with numerous other disadvantages. Senior staff have
complained at being unable to identify where the hold ups are, with decision-making
unclear to locals. What is clear is that recruitment for Whakatāne takes a back seat to
Tauranga.
This is made worse by the lack of a local General Manager for the hospital, someone who
has oversight over the whole hospital, a local perspective, and who can advocate within Te
Whatu Ora for Whakatāne’s needs.
Even when people are recruited, staff shortages mean that doctors and nurses are
constantly under stress and exhausted, leading to people leaving. The Coalition
understands that of the four obstetricians who recently resigned, leading to the closure of
the unit, three had been recruited from the USA within the last couple of years. They
moved country, relocated families, bought houses here, only to move on within a short
space of time. This is indicative of a dysfunctional working environment and poor
management from Tauranga and our coalition hopes that those people will tell their tale so
the local community can understand what is going wrong at the hospital.
On top of all of that, succession planning seems to be almost non-existent. Te Whatu Ora
had plenty of advance warning of at least one of the obstetricians resignations but didn’t fill
the position, leading to gaps in the roster and only patchy coverage since last year. In
another department a doctor coming up for retirement gave a years notice, but the hospital
sat on it’s hand rather than proactively planning for it. There are enough cases that it
seems to be a systemic issue. Overseas recruitment is vital to keep the hospital staffed,
and at least 6 months is needed to allow to visas to be approved and families to relocate,
so succession planning is a necessity. The lack of dedicated recruitment staff also means
that silly mistakes get made. Recently a number of new staff had to be put on hold
because they had applied for the wrong visa, following faulty advice.

Some of the problems are not new but recent moves to a more centralised system have
made it worse, with Whakatāne staff having little autonomy to make decisions about what
is best for our community. Added to that is cost cutting driven from Wellington, including
the downgrading of the back office functions that front line staff rely on to do their job.
I am deeply disturbed at what has come to light since the closure of Obstetrics and
Gynecology services. It is apparent that a number of other department’s are on the edge of
collapse. We cannot allow this to happen. Whakatāne has always had excellent medical
services, as many of us know from personal experience. We need to join together to fight
to keep them.
The Hikoi for Health Coalition is a broad coalition of people behind the Hikoi for Health
thus Saturday. Members come from a wide range of backgrounds and ages and from
across the political spectrum, united in their determination to protect local medical services
and staff . They include concerned members of the community, health professionals, as
well as representatives of organisations such as Whakatane Action Group, Whakatāne Act
Local, NZ Labour and the Green Party.
We are not medical experts but from talking to people who are, it is clear that there are a
number of things that could be put in place straight away to ease the situation. Allowing
heads of departments to appoint staff to vacant positions without having to go through
Tauranga is one. The appointment of a local General Manager to the hospital is another.
Third is to appoint some recruitment specialists. Lastly Te Whatu Ora needs to improve its
management of people and rosters and support our amazing medical staff. We will be
marching on Saturday Feb 15 at 12 noon from Mitchell Park to call for urgent action to
reinstate full maternity services in Whakatāne, and to fix the broader systemic issues at
the hospital.


Published in the Whakatāne Beacon 12/02/25

Tagged , , , , , , ,

MAKE OUR VOICES HEARD ON OBSTETRICS CLOSURE

The decision to close down secondary birthing services at Whakatāne Hospital will put mothers and babies at risk. Not just in Whakatāne, but across the wider Eastern Bay area and up the coast. It means that only low risk births will be supported in Whakatane, with an estimated 300 deliveries a year having to transfer to Tauranga. That’s a long way to go in an emergency. Whānau will have worse outcomes and reduced choices. We cannot allow it to stand.

The closure has already taken place, last week. We are assured it is temporary, and that the service will reopen in 12 to 18 months, once new specialists can be recruited. I find it hard to believe that this will actually happen. My concern is that it will become the victim of a broader push by this government to slash spending in the public health service. This is already happening in other areas of healthcare. Once we have become used to the lack of services in Whakatāne it becomes too easy to just let the restart deadline slide, and keeping sliding, until it just becomes the new normal. Even if that is not what Te Whatu Ora intends right now, without a strong community pushback other priorities will come to the fore as local health bosses grapple with increasing central government demands for savings.

We are told that the service is closing because the hospital has not been able to recruit the specialist staff needed to run it. There has been some internal criticism that they haven’t been actively recruiting, and that the shortage of staff was foreseeable. Could this closure have been avoided? I am not an expert and I know how easy it is to criticise people when you don’t have all the facts. I believe that Te Whatu Ora regional leadership has done the best it could do with what it had. The question for us as a community is how do we make sure that our opposition to the closure is heard, and that we don’t allow it to become a permanent thing? Taking Te Whatu Ora at their word, how can we best support them to ensure that the funding is there to restart when new staff have been recruited?

It is not Council’s job to fix the public health service. We don’t have the expertise, the resources or the mandate. I do think it is council business, however, to talk about the closure of critical local medical services, to advocate for our community and to pressure the government to do better by this sub-region. We are a growing area and right now the Government should be investing in us – in housing, in workforce development, in business support, and yes, in increased medical services. It is not a time to go backwards.

The pressure must come from the community. It is about our willingness to stand up for ourselves. A number of people have said that we need a march to demand the reopening of the service, and after talking to Kat Walsh (who started the petition) and others I am putting my hand up to be the contact point. We need to keep this issue on the table and not allow it to slide into oblivion. A strong show of support from the community will make a huge difference right now, to make sure the issue doesn’t get forgotten. If you are willing to help organise the march, please get in touch. We need a strong team of us to make it a success.

Following a successful march, I think there are a number of other things that the council can do to support the community. It just takes some political leadership and skill. Council is not just about roads and water pipes. Civic leadership, backing our communities and supporting local action on important issues like this are all part of a council’s role.

If you can help organise the march please contact Nandor at <nandor.tanczos@whakatane.govt.nz> or 021 887 011

Published in the Whakatāne Beacon 22/01/25

Tagged , , , , , , ,

On Leadership

Many of us have experienced ‘seagull management’. That’s when the boss flies in, squawks aggressively, craps on everything, and flies out. It’s not the best way to get top performance out of people.

But what is real leadership? Is it getting into a position of authority so you can order people about? Or is leadership about lifting up the people around you? I believe that good leadership is about bringing out the best in others. That takes a set of specific skills that can be learnt by anyone, even though some people have more natural talent for it. Just about everyone is a leader in some form, whether as Prime Minister, a business owner, a community volunteer, a family member or just someone trying to better themselves. Leadership is about stepping up to make positive change. More than anything, leadership is about taking responsibility.

There are people who find themselves in a formal position of leadership but who cannot lead, while great leadership can be witnessed in people without official titles. Sometimes in organisations we see a technical expert who has been elevated into a leadership role. Being a qualified expert doesn’t automatically make them a good leader. Some people thrive on the change, but others are unable to make the transition. The key difference is whether they can accept that they have something to learn. What serves us well in one context may not serve us in another.

US President Harry Truman had a sign on his desk that said “the buck stops here”. That should be every aspiring leader’s motto. It means taking responsibility for the difficult choices that have to be made, and accepting responsibility for the outcomes. It means being decisive, once all the relevant information has been gathered. Some people want to jump the gun before they have all the information. Others procrastinate, calling for more and more reports to delay having to decide. That is not leadership. And once a decision is made, it is important to see it through. Of course we must learn from new information and admit if we made a mistake, but vacillating and uncertainty can sometimes have worse consequences than a bad decision.

Taking responsibility means living with the consequences of the decisions you have made – taking it on the chin if need be, rather than looking for someone else to blame. That also goes for group decisions. No group agrees all the time, but if you lead a team and you consistently oppose everyone else, it is time to examine your leadership. If you feel isolated and unable to pursue your goals,examine your leadership. Are you working with the team, for the team purpose? Are you listening to other points of view? Are you communicating your ideas clearly, and do they stand up to scrutiny?

Good leadership is active, and thoughtful. Slogans don’t cut it. It is important to have high expectations, but the real work is in developing a strategy with others on how to collectively achieve them. People need real solutions, not just empty words. It’s easy to identify all the troubles with the world – there are plenty enough of them – but the question is what, specifically, we are doing to do about it.

Leadership is also about looking after your people. It’s about bringing out the best in everyone, supporting and mentoring others to reach their potential. It’s about giving other people the chance to shine rather than hogging the limelight or constantly trying to prove that you’re the smartest one in the room. Good leadership requires emotional maturity and personal development, so we are not taking out our own insecurities on others. We are there to serve the team and the kaupapa, not our own ego needs.

The top down, ‘my way or the highway’ approach just doesn’t work any more, if it ever really did. Good leaders know how to build effective teams, how to get the best out of all the players, and how to unify everyone around a common purpose. It is about their ability to bring everyone along. You cannot be a leader if no one else wants to come with.

Tagged , , , , ,

My thoughts on the result of the 2024 US Presidential election

As I have so many times in my life, I give thanks that I wasn’t born in the USA. If I cared a great deal about the fate of that country, I’d be more than despondent right now.

In some ways though, not a lot will change for the rest of us as a result of this election. The US will continue to behave like a ravenous beast, insatiable and devouring. It will continue funding and arming tyrants and despots as it always has. Whether Trump or Harris occupies the Whitehouse, the genocidal fury of Israel will continue to commit atrocities against Palestinians with US protection and material support. Whoever is in power in Washington, the primary driver of US foreign policy is always to shore up access to energy and other earth resources, and preserve its economic and political pre-eminence. Famously, the American way of life is not negotiable – aka FTW.
The election of Trump does mean even more weakening of global and regional institutions, but that has been going on for some time now. As a Rastafarian I am strongly committed to international forums where conflicts can be mediated without violence and where regional and global priorities (eg the SDGs) can be negotiated, but the gerrymandering of the United Nations by the Security Council and the impotence of things like the International Criminal Court to prosecute the more connected war criminals mean those organisations are losing relevance and legitimacy in many people’s eyes. Similarly, the inability for international forums to come of any meaningful agreements on climate change, commensurate with the urgency and enormity of the crisis facing humanity, makes it hard to muster real anger over his climate change denialism. Maybe if the world just sidelines the USA more progress is possible. Let them catch up when they waken from their coma.

Trump will no doubt throw a few buckets of chaos into the global mix, but it’s not like times are not chaotic as it is. Secretly many around the world will be hoping this spells the end of the USA as the dominant global superpower – ironic given that his slogan was MAGA.
So yes, having a degenerate idiot in the Whitehouse will have ripple effects for us all, but it won’t be the worst thing to happen this century. We have messed up in all kinds of ways and the chickens are rapidly coming home to roost.
What really concerns me is much more small scale and local. Of all the things that Trump did during his last tenure, probably the thing that horrified me the most was seeing those children being separated from the parents at the border. Locked in cages, sleeping on tiled floors with space blankets, and then hearing that the record keeping was so chaotic that many of those children would never be reunited with their families again. There was no way of knowing who they belonged to, and many of them were too young to be able to say. The question of where those children are now, the horrific possibilities, still haunts me. So now, I fear that the suffering of ordinary people in the USA and neighbouring countries will become much worse.

Trump, Vance and their handlers – the vampire Peter Thiel, the fascist Elon Musk, and all those other billionaires backing them and whispering ideas into their ears, will be seeking to remake America in their own image. The US is barely a democracy as it is, but I’m sure they have ideas about how to concentrate even more power in their own hands. The end of the republic was the beginning of the end of ancient Rome. I can’t help feeling that Trump’s election is similarly a sign that the US is in a downward spiral from which it will not recover. It’s not that Trump will be the cause. He is a symptom. That a man like that could be elected President just says so much about the state of that nation.

Tagged , ,

My Submission to the Covid Inquiry

QU ONE: LOOKING BACK
My father died on 15 March 2020 of a heart attack. He lived in the UK and my mum phoned at midnight to tell me he was lying dead on the kitchen floor. What should she do? Could I come over? I said yes, of course.

It soon became apparent, however, that if I flew to England there was no way of knowing when I would be able to return. A pandemic had just been announced by the WHO and travel restrictions were starting to be put into place on the 16th. Could I leave my wife and children alone for who knew how long, and take the risk of flying into an epicentre? I decided to stay in Aotearoa and look after my family. Luckily my brother also lives in the UK and was able to help my mother navigate the autopsy, cremation and managing the financial affairs in the bureaucratic chaos that the UK was becoming.

That was very hard for us all. It was 3 years later that I was able to see my mother and visit my father’s grave.

Many people suffered as a result of the pandemic, many far worse than me. But no one is to blame. Well perhaps we all are. There are too many people on the planet and maybe nature is trying to bring us back into balance. In any case, in humanitarian terms our government’s response was largely the right one, and many thousands of people are still alive because as a nation we chose to follow the science and the evidence we had at the time. It angers me that some people would try to belittle that, or deny that covid was real or as serious as it was. I recall following the John Hopkins University website and watching the numbers of fatalities tracking up. I read up as much as a lay person can reasonably expect to about the efficacy of the vaccines and the value of lockdowns. As someone who is instinctively sceptical about vaccines, it became obvious to me that the vaccine saved lives. Yes being vaccinated carried risk. Like all medication, some people suffered side effects. But the evidence was clear that the risks from not being vaccinated were far greater. I think NZ was very lucky to have leaders who made good decisions on our behalf. Other countries with poor leadership suffered great loss of life compared to us.

Not every decision was perfect. I think the way lockdown was imposed placed real hardship on small businesses and advantaged large corporations. I think the way subsidy money was handled was open to abuse and again the money disproportionately went to the wealthiest corporations. The economic impact could have been more equitably handled. We could have used it as an opportunity to bolster local self reliance rather than more dependence on long supply chains. We could have used it to promote health and well-being alongside vaccinations messaging instead of allowing it to be seen as an either/or. We could have done more to promote equitable access to essential medicines on a global scale. Lost opportunities.

Also some of the communications were poorly messaged. While the regular updates were great at keeping people informed, phrases like ‘single source of truth’ and ‘social distancing’ (as opposed to the more accurate ‘physical distancing’) were not helpful. The government could have done more in countering misinformation.

Having said that, it was hard to predict the sheer craziness that would erupt, fuelled by international money funding local grifters. That they managed to pull in so many well-meaning people who had justifiable questions about the impacts of the policies is an indictment on Government communications. That some became cult followers living in an information bubble and disbelieving anything that contradicted their viewpoint is a tragedy.

I am a decision-maker in a large organisation. We introduced a vaccine mandate for all staff who interface with the public. We lost people over it and were heavily criticised by a small number in the community. Front line staff faced verbal and physical abuse because of those decisions, although we did our best to maintain services for all, vaccinated and unvaccinated alike. It was a difficult decision but I have no regrets about the stance that we took. Our priority was to safeguard the health and well-being of our staff and our community. Most people in our community understood why we took the position we did and supported us. People absolutely have a right to choose whether or not to receive a vaccine, or any other medical treatment. They do not have a right to put others at risk. Choices have consequences – not as a punishment, but in terms of minimising the potential impacts on others.
The lesson for me in that is that it is easy to read too much into the strongly held opinions of a small number of people. Their concerns shouldn’t be ignored, we should learn from them, but we shouldn’t over-react or think they represent the views of most people. This inquiry will no doubt hear lots of submissions from militant anti-vaxxers. Some of those will misrepresent what happened, deny the scientific evidence, and fabricate events, either deliberately or simply because they truly believe things that are false. For example I had a friend who I trust tell me that their partner had adverse effects from the vaccination. The partner denied it when asked, and from their story it seemed like it was an exaggeration of events. I do not think they meant to lie, but that their perceptions were so biased as to mislead them.
So it is up to you, the commissioners, to look honestly, soberly and robustly at the evidence and provide some impartial answers to people’s many questions. No doubt whatever you say, you will be criticised and attacked. I encourage you to pay no attention to that and just present your views as honestly and impartially as you can. Thank you.

QU TWO: LOOKING FORWARD
As I mentioned in the first question, I think the things we need to learn are:
1. To think holistically and in an integrated way. For example, how can we use an emergency such as a pandemic, and its recovery, to achieve multiple social-economic aims such as boosting local economic self-reliance and circular economies, encouraging individual health and well-being alongside pharmaceutical interventions, looking after our most economically vulnerable instead to defaulting to throwing money at the wealthy.
2. I would like to see us do more as a national to support the freeing up of pharmaceutical IP rights to allow more equitable access to essential medicines such as vaccines across the globe. Too often NZ seems to take a position on the world stage of bolstering corporate rights over the rights of people to access medicine, and the common wealth of the body of scientific knowledge.

3. We need to be better prepared to counter misinformation by global actors driven by ideology rather than by scientific evidence.

Tagged , , , , ,

WHY I VOTED FOR A 9.5% RATES RISE


People often say they want politicians to be honest. Sometimes that means saying things that they don’t want to hear. That is especially true when it comes to rates.
People don’t need to be told that costs are going up. They see it every time they shop for groceries or get a tradie to fix something. The same is true for council. For the things that council spends most of its money on, like construction and maintenance, inflation is even higher than for households. It probably costs council about twenty percent more to do things this year than last.
It’s not just inflation. Storm damage is increasing. Climate change means we need to spend more each year to fix things up, and spend more money on making our infrastructure resilient for the future. In addition, years of underfunding has meant that there is a large unpaid bill looming. For example waste water pipes in Edgecumbe have remained cracked since the ’87 earthquake and that is causing problems with storm water infiltration into the system. That needs money to fix.
Councillors in the past have at times been more focused on minimising rates rises than doing the work needed. You can understand why. Voters tend to elect people who promise to keep the rates down, and don’t always ask how they plan to do that. Often it’s by making short sighted decisions. An example is Whakatāne town’s water supply. It could have been secured for a moderate additional amount of money when the bore went in at Paul’s Road many years ago but wasn’t, to avoid a rates rise. That decision has led to much bigger costs to try to find a new supply, and we are not even there yet.
In addition to all that, central government is constantly adding new responsibilities to councils but without providing the funding to pay for it. The job of local government is getting bigger all the time.
Plus health and safety now requires two people to do some of the things that used to be done by one, especially people working in remote places, so as to ensure there is back-up if anything goes wrong.
What do we do? We can cut services, but to make any real impact we’re not talking about a planter box here or a painted line there. We’re talking about significantly cutting services – closing libraries, shutting down swimming pools, or the airport, letting our local roads deteriorate (as Waka Kotahi has been doing with State Highways). Council staff have been trimming costs where they can, or deferring projects to smooth out spending, and that has helped keep rates rises below 10%, but no elected council member has supported taking a chainsaw to council services.
Actually, the main way that rates rises have stayed below 10% for next year is borrowing. It’s not an approach I’m happy with. Borrowing to pay for intergenerational infrastructure is a good strategy, but borrowing just to cover the bills is a recipe for long term trouble.
The question that councillors had to decide this year is whether to borrow more money and stay with a 6.3% increase, or borrow a bit less for a 9.5% increase. Ease the financial pain for people now, but with even more pain next year when we have to make up the shortfall, or bite the bullet now to avoid cementing in bigger rates increases in the future.

It was a hard decision. We all know that people are struggling to pay bills as it is. No one wants to add more financial hardship than necessary, but whatever happens those costs are not going away.
In fact by pushing them into the future, they just get bigger. That does no one any good.

Published in the Whakatane Beacon 16/6/23

Tagged

Building a resilient future

Sometimes people don’t need more facts. What they need is a plan.

You don’t need to be a rocket scientist to realise that we face multiple challenges in the world today – environmental, economic, political and social. Climate change is far from the only problem, but it is probably the most significant, because it makes everything else much worse. Many of us have been talking about this for decades, and slowly gaining traction, but it wasn’t another rigorous, scientifically conservative, well referenced report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change that seems to have tipped the balance. It has taken a cyclone of unprecedented scale to bring home the real cost of our, and the world’s, inaction.

The science tells us that we still have a brief window to stop runaway climate change. That means we can still prevent the sort of feedback loops that would probably bring an end to homo sapiens 10,000 year experiment with civilisation. If they kick in, we just won’t have the abundance of resources, including the food surplus, to make cities work.

So it give me great comfort to know that the window still exists. That’s a helpful fact. Now what we need is a plan.

That has been my main focus since first being elected to Whakatāne District Council in 2016. In that first term the council agreed a set of principles to govern how we respond to climate change. We asked the people of Whakatāne for feedbaack, and we got strong support. In my second term on council we agreed a set of strategies, targets and action plans. Again these got strong support. The result has been both reduced council carbon emissions and substantial work on adapting to climate change. Last year we agreed on a reset of those strategies – a shifting of gears. You can expect to have your say as part of that work.

I need to add here that I didn’t do that work by myself. The success of the programe is really down to the highly talented staff that work and have worked at WDC. What I provided was the political leadership that allowed staff to do their jobs well.

The next phase of the climate change work needs to engage our communities better. If we have learned anything from the array of disasters that Whakatāne District and other areas have experienced, it’s the need for resilience in the face of an uncertain future. At the heart of resilience is community.

National and regional agencies, and the council, are important in terms of emergency response and long term recovery, but it is our willingness to look after each other that is the most critical. It is when we check on the neighbours because we know they may need a little help, or get stuck in where we see the need, that we see the best of us. Great examples are the Community Emergency Response Teams in action, or springing up, in places like Edgecumbe, Matatā, Waiohau, Thornton, Galatea / Murupara, Awatapu and Manawahe. Marae, who fling open their doors to become critical parts of the emergency response infrastructure, are another. It is a reminder of how blessed we are in the Eastern Bay to live in communities where people look out for each other.

Adapting to climate change isn’t just about disaster response. Council’s job is to make sure our infrastructure is both robust (strong) and resilient (able to spring back when parts of the system fail), but that’s just one part of the story. Given the impacts that Cyclone Gabrielle is already having on things like food supplies, how do we build a more resilient economy in the Eastern Bay? It’s not just about food sovereignty – we need to build strong local economies, that cycle resources (including money) around and around the community as many times as possible so as to extract maximum value.

WDC Council members were privileged recently to hear from Jacob Kajavala of Industrial Symbiosis Kawerau about the work to build synergies across businesses in Kawerau (and increasingly beyond). They work with workforce development training, recruitment and employment, and growing industry and opportunity. These kinds of collaborations across local businesses have great potential to build a vibrant local business ecosystem which provides some buffer from international economic shocks because they are grounded in strong and enduring relationships.This could be a building block towards a true circular economy, where upcycling applies to resource flows (eg the waste from one enterprise becomes the feedstock for another) people flows and financial flows.

It’s just one example of how the Eastern Bay of Plenty has the ingredients we need to build a strong, resilient, interconnected, prosperous and ecologically grounded sub-region. We just need a positive vision and leadership.

First published in the WhakatāneBeacon 8/3/23

Tagged , , , ,